Wednesday 18 February 2015

Why we don't tend to write G-d, or call God Hashem, or wait for the Messiah (male... or female)!

  

Jane writes:

Dear Rabbi, 
Though I grew up as a Christian, I never understood the idea of the Trinity, and am by no means a polytheist at all, G-D  forbid. I believe HaShem is a singularity, an all powerful form of sentient energy that reconciles many of the 'atheist questions' we have on G-d. For me the Shema daily prayer, stating Adonai Ehad (The LORD is One), means that for us human beings to have evolved to where we are today, there has to be a singular intelligent all-powerful force behind it to make all the delicate conditions for life. That's what my heart tells me. I did go to a Catholic primary school but I absolutely cannot understand their logic of the Trinity, more importantly I feel it is not logical to put their faith in One Man to atone for their sins. Christianity for me seems a bit idolatrous.... But I would be interested to know whether you believe in a Messiah, as I believe orthodox Jews are supposed to?

Thanks for your introduction and questions, Jane.

I should point out that there are some things that you do not need to do if you wish to explore Judaism within the Progressive framework - more than that, some of us are uncomfortable with them for a variety of reasons, in part because they are signs of 'ultra-orthodox theology'.  God is not God's name - and English is not 'lashon hakodesh' (the holy language - Hebrew) - and therefore there is no need at all to write G-d.  Similarly 'hashem' means 'the name'.  God is not limited to a name (indeed one tradition is that there are 72 names for God!).  And God does not need our protection. Saying God is not blasphemy or 'taking God's name in vain'.  On the other hand, a major principle of Progressive Judaism is equality - treating all people as equals, created in the 'image of God', whether Jews or other people, whether straight or gay or 'gender-fluid' - and whether biologically male or female. We now graduate as many women as men rabbis, and a girl reads from the Torah and leads parts of the service for the Bat Mitzvah just as a boy does for the Bar Mitzvah.  Women can wear kippah and tallit (the 'prayer clothing') in our synagogues just as men do.  This is a very important principle, and one of the tangible differences between Progressive and Orthodox Judaism (though orthodoxy is slowly giving girls and women somewhat more say as well).  But a crucial part of this is language sensitivity.  Our prayer books do not say 'all men' or 'all mankind' when they obviously mean 'all people'. And similarly, we no longer use masculine terms (lord, king, master) about God, who we all know is far beyond any gender concept at all (how can women be made in the image of 'lord' or 'master'?).  The tetragrammaton, God's most 'intimate', personal name (the hebrew letters YHVH) is one we cannot pronounce - because millenia ago its use was limited more and more, until only the High Priest could say it, only in the Holy of Holies, and only on one day of the year (Yom Kippur).  Now we no longer have a High Priest or a Tabernacle or Temple, and have lost its pronunciation.  Tradition dictates that when we see it, we instead say 'Adonai' (something like 'my Lord', though actually a plural form).  Whilst tradition is important and has a vote (but famously not a veto) in the Progressive tradition, and we still read YHVH as 'Adonai' in Hebrew, we render it differently in English.  Martin Buber observed that the three tenses of the verb 'To Be' in Hebrew can be made from the four hebrew letters of YHVH - that is: HaYa, was, HoVeH, is, and YiHYeH, will be.  In other words, our best understanding of God's most intimate name is 'always-ness', or 'Eternal'.  And we do know that God is One - a Unity - and hence we use the terms Eternal, Eternal One or Eternal God when we represent YHVH in translations.

I think this addresses much of what you say about your views of Christianity, but let me add something about a 'Messiah'. In the Progressive movement, we tend to believe or hope more for a 'Messianic time' than an individual Messiah (Mashiach).  In part this is because we have been damaged too many times by claims of false Messiahs.  Indeed the Rabbis teach us that if you are planting a tree (symbol of investment in the future), and they cry 'The Messiah has come, the Messiah has come', first finish planting the tree, then go and see!  The Jewish test of whether the Messiah has really come, is 'is the world perfect? Have people stopped terrorising others, so each may live under their vine and fig tree, and the lion may lie down with the lamb?  With that test, clearly Jesus was not the Messiah.  So though we accept Jesus - probably Yehoshua or Yeshu - as a thoroughly Jewish, if perhaps radical and charismatic, teacher and healer, we reject Christ - the anointed, Messianic aspect - and indeed Christianity had to develop an entirely new theology of 'the second coming' for exactly the same reason.  You could say they are still waiting for the Messiah to bring a time of perfection - and so are we!  And when Menachem Mendel Shneerson (commonly known as The Lubavitcher Rebbe) died in 1994, his (ultra-orthodox Jewish) followers concluded that he was the Messiah - because not only was he so loved and saintly, but he had not appointed a successor - so he must have known that he was the Messiah! They waited by his bedside for days, and weeks, and eventually had to borrow a theology foreign to Judaism - that he would return! (Hence the 'We want Mashiach Now! movement').

But never mind them.  The strongest reason, in my opinion, for not relying on an individual saviour, is that it would take the onus off us!  If we seek a 'Messianic time', a 'Time of Perfection', then we should get off our daily grind, and do whatever we can to move the world in that direction.  In that regard, the prayer book becomes a 'mirror of prayer', a checklist - are we matching up to God's expectations for us?  Are we doing all that we have the (God-given) potential to do?  And by the way, this is not really that different from Jewish tradition, as stated by Rav Isaac Kook; each of us has the potential to be the Messiah!

Hope that all helps!

L'shalom

Rabbi Jonathan

Tuesday 17 February 2015

A Chinese person with exposure to various traditions finds Judaism most appealing.

Dear Progressive Judaism Victoria,

My name is David and I am currently a non Jewish student with a
great fascination about Jewish/Israeli culture and theological practice.
Though I am not an extremely religious person I feel very connected to the
Jewish people as well as the land of Israel. I have deep sympathy and
admiration for the triumph of the Zionist movement against all odds and so I
visited Israel earlier in January and I can say, despite my substantially
secular thinking, my connection towards the Jewish people and Israel
intensified a lot. I am looking at perhaps a conversion to Reconstructionist
Judaism in the future so I am interested in the process of applying and
going through the Online Courses offered by PJV.  

Thank You

PS, I know according to the Halakah a convert has to be dissuaded three
times before being accepted into the course. It's a test of not taking no
for an answer and after all one is not going to be a good Jew without some
Chutzpah :)....

Rabbi Jonathan asked David for further details:

Hi David,

Ellen has passed your enquiry about the on-line Introduction to Judaism course to me as I am the course Supervising Rabbi.  Thank you for your interest.

If you decide it is for you, we will extend a very warm and hearty welcome.  Be reassured that, if you do proceed, and if you do ultimately apply to convert, we will not send you away three times, despite the halacha!

We are delighted when intelligent adults come to the conclusion that a Progressive Jewish approach offers a meaningful and stimulating spiritual framework for their lives.  If only many born Jews realised what a treasure they had inherited!

Reconstructionism, as you seem to be aware, has less emphasis on a 'personal, responsive God', and more on culture and 'peoplehood'. Since we believe in 'Educated Choice' and that everyone's journey and experience is different, we have no problem with this, and indeed the Reconstructionist Movement has for years now been a part of the 'World Union of Progressive Judaism', our global body. Our colleague in Adelaide, Rabbi Shoshana Kaminsky, who was until recently the Chair of our Rabbinic Assembly, graduated from a Reconstructionist Seminary in the US.

Can I ask for a bit more background to understand your situation - where you are living? Have you spoken to a Rabbi about your interest up to now? Have you attended Shabbat services?


I look forward to hearing back from you,


L'shalom




Dear Rabbi,

I live in Hobart and have consulted with the local Progressive Jewish community. I have not attended their Shabbat services but I have had Hebrew lessons there and experienced Shabbat in Israel when I went over there in January. I have not yet have had a serious discussion with a Rabbi that is representative of any community regarding my intentions to study Judaism and maybe convert. (Apparently the Progressive Community in Hobart does not have a progressive Rabbi and they have joint services with Modern Orthodox congregations). I do have a vague understanding of the process, study period, Beit Din and The Bris Milah + Mikvah ceremonies. This is why I am contacting Progressive Judaism Victoria. 

Rabbi Jonathan responded:

Thanks David.  With regard to Hobart, you are slightly incorrect - although the orthodox and Progressive are both members of the same community and have social and other events together, they do hold separate orthodox and progressive services.  This is very important, especially if you wish to go on to convert, as it will be necessary to attend services regularly, including the main ones of Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Pesach, Shavuot and Sukkot.  

By the way there is also a Progressive Consulting Rabbi attached to the community who visits at least annually.  If you do decide to go ahead with the conversion after the Intro course, I would be willing to be your Sponsoring Rabbi in the absence of a permanent Progressive colleague being there.  

You have not told us what your work is, what age group you are and what your family situation is, all of which are useful to understand more your needs and expectations and how best to support you, so please let me know.

I suggest that the next step is to review the on-line course for which you will find details at: http://pjv.org.au/education/introduction-judaism-course-online-course#overlay-context=education/introduction-judaism-course-online-course

There are materials and questions for two free introductory sessions.  Please do those and submit them to tutor1@pjv.org.au, and we'll take it from there.

L'shalom

Rabbi Jonathan

Dear Rabbi Jonathan:

To give a brief introduction of myself, I am Chinese. I grew up in a multicultural background. In terms of religious background my family is pretty mixed, most of them live in China. My dad is a devout Tibetan Buddhist, whilst my mum's theological beliefs are eclectic. My aunt is a devout Christian who started her own church and my grandparents are/were atheists brought up under an era of communism.  However ever since I was in my teenager years, I have been fascinated by Judaism, Zionism and the State of Israel, especially whilst others seem to have an unwarranted and naive bias against Israel. I greatly sympathize with Israel and the Jewish people, especially their tremendous society (it's not easy to be a democracy when everybody around wants to murder you) and scientific achievements. The connection I feel for Israel only intensified when I visited Israel earlier this year.

As for my occupation, I work in international relations.  This has had a substantial impact on my decision to convert to Progressive/Reconstructionist Judaism. I am not biased against Hasadic and Orthodox Judaism: in fact the Chabad's holy book, the Tanya, and its description of the Human nature in the Tzaddik (yetzer HaTov/Good spiritual inclination) and Rasha (Yetzer Ra/bad inclination) along with various other concepts had a dramatic impact in sparking my interest in Judaism. In question of my religious beliefs and my feelings towards the Torah and other academic items, I am a believer in both Baruch Spinoza (Very famed Jewish Renaissance philosopher... a pioneer of panenthiesm/Pandeism) and Rabbi Mordechai Kaplan, founder of Reconstructionism. If I am not mistaken, Rabbi Jonathan, being a panenthiest/Pandeist who has a more rationalist approach to God and who accepts the Torah/Halakah on a contextual folklore basis should not disqualify a person from converting, right???  Although Spinoza and Kaplan are somewhat too modern, even the famed Hasidic Rabbi Israel Ben Eliezer did have some panenthiest theological principles..... 

My belief in Progressive Judaism also stems from the fact that when I read the Torah, I do not see it as a divine originated historical document but a very wise ancient text on human nature and morality written by divinely inspired individuals.


To which Rabbi Jonathan responded:

Thanks David,



I'd be a bit wary about describing/thinking of yourself as panetheist/pandeist.  Although we don't need to narrow God down into the biblical/Michaelangelo 'super-man' image (old man, long beard, on a cloud!), it is a fundamental belief of Judaism that there is 'one universal creator' (Sh'ma - Listen up you Jews, Our God is Eternal, the Eternal God is ONE).


Though there are doubtless atheist Jews and Buddhist Jews and even pantheist Jews, once one is a Jew, we can't stop anyone from believing whatever they want ('ortho-dox' is a misnomer as one does not have to have one - equal - belief, just a standard [set of] practice).

Generally, 'joining the club' may require beliefs and understandings that those who are already members of the club may not fully share!  And I am probably more liberal and accommodating in this area than some of my colleagues!

However a Progressive Jewish understanding of Torah absolutely coincides with yours.  We are not expecting you to believe that God gave Torah!

Hope that helps,

L'shalom

Rabbi Jonathan

Dear Rabbi Jonathan,

I am by no means a polytheist at all!  I see God as a singularity - an all-powerful form of sentient energy that encompasses the working laws of the natural universe - there has to be a singular intelligent all powerful force behind it to make all the delicate conditions for life. 

To which Rabbi Jonathan responded:

Great response,
Thanks David, I look forward to working with you!